And it was not good anymore

Carola Dahmen

And it was not good anymore

The ecofeminist theologies of Sallie McFague and Catherine Keller are seemingly opposed to the dialectical theology of Kornelis Heiko Miskotte.

Carola Dahmen

Theologian, Writer and Speaker.

A Word From The Author

Carola Dahmen, born in Wiesbaden, Germany in 1985, has a diverse background that spans theology and psychology. After completing her secondary education at Mosbacher Berg High School in Wiesbaden, she embarked on a journey of service and learning.

Carola Dahmen’s multifaceted background reflects her dedication to faith, community, and scholarly inquiry. 

What people are saying

What should theology bring in our time of an ecological crisis that demolishes the more-than-human nature? We don’t need any theological soothing of the crisis, but neither do we need theology to phrase new ideologies, which bring subtle metaphors like body and nature to new absolutes.

In her fascinating PhD dissertation Carola Dahmen manages to bring forward a positive and ideology-critical theological stance. She translates a mystical clinge to nature as she uncovers in Miskotte, strengthened and sieved through dialectical theology, as an instrument for ecofeminist theology.

Theology may forge the force to lament, resist, and rebuke the injustice done to nature, both human and more-than-human. It is up to us to live this theology, for it is not good anymore.

dr. Theo Hettema,
Lecturer Alliance of Free Evangelical Churches.

Driven by her love for nature, her heartfelt concern about the consequences of climate change, and a prophetic anger in the face of social injustice resulting from the ecological crisis, Carola Dahmen has written a highly urgent and theologically well-founded dissertation. She makes clear how the ecological crisis is – and should be! – a theological crisis as well. Facing the ecological crisis, struggling with the God of life is not only inescapable but perhaps even required to open the way for hopeful transformation. Apart from a much-needed contribution to the field of ecofeminist theology, for me as a minister, this dissertation is also a stimulating challenge to rethink how I speak about the relationship between God and the more-than-human nature. No sermon about how the Word became flesh will ever sound the same again.

Rianne de Reus
predikant Protestantse Gemeente Warmond

This dissertation is of burning topicality, which is immediately expressed in the title fiercely and sharply: And it was not good anymore. Where God could still say after each day of creation that He saw it was good, Carola Dahmen can no longer say that today. The book is written with crystal clarity and is exciting to read. It is very captivating and original to bring the ecofeminists into critical conversation with none other than Heiko Miskotte and, on the sidelines, with Barth, Deurloo, and the Amsterdam School. Does the resistance to natural theology blind us to the dangers threatening more-than-human nature? How can Miskotte's euphoria about nature be interpreted in this context? I read the book with pleasure and learned a lot from it, although I sometimes think: don't we know anyway that we must be careful and treat more-than-human nature with care? Do I need theology to see the urgency of this?

Jaap Goorhuis
Emiritus Predikant, PKN - Friesland

About The Book

The ecofeminist theologies of Sallie McFague and Catherine Keller are seemingly in opposition to the dialectical theology of Kornelis Heiko Miskotte. In this study, their theologies are engaged in a staged discussion to address the question of how we might think about the relationship between God and the more-than-human nature of our time. An ecofeminist theology that recognizes God’s alterity in the intimacy of the flesh offers a prophetic way to deal with the threat to life on earth. McFague and Keller propose an image of God that is bodily and immanently connected to the more-than-human nature. Such an image of God, which goes beyond the anthropocentric approach, is significant in our context of ecological crisis. Similar to his theological friend Karl Barth, Miskotte rejected natural theology but was also known for his intense love of ‘nature’ and his unwavering appreciation of earthly life. Although he thought of God as completely different, Miskotte believed that God is also intimately present in creation.”

Subscribe Now to Get Regular Updates


    Input this code: captcha

    Scroll to Top